Why are Double-decker buses so rare outside the UK?
As a transport enthusiast, whenever I go on holiday, I always check out what the buses are like.
The variety between all of them is quite interesting. For example, Brussels doesn't have as many buses thanks to its excellent tram system whereas Hong Kong, despite having a large Metro system still has an expansive bus network which is quite competitive with the MTR.
But the question which often bugs me is this:
Why are double-decker buses so rare outside the UK?
To help answer this question, I've set up a list of pros and cons for double deckers.
But First...
I'm aware that there are other places that use double deckers, most notably Singapore & Hong Kong.
However, most places prefer articulated buses (such almost all of Europe).
Advantages:
 |
| One of London's many Double-Decker buses |
- Double Decker Buses have more seats than articulated buses which have a larger proportion of standing passengers at full load
- Double Decker Buses have a smaller length than articulated buses, so take up less space on the road and reducing congestion.
- Articulated buses require a much larger turning circle, making them less suitable for narrow streets
- The second floor allows for better views (particularly the ones at the front)
- Less doors means less fare dodgers
- More space for adverts (so more revenue)
Disadvantages:
 |
| An articulated bus in Brussels |
- Articulated Buses have more doors, allowing for quicker boarding and alighting
- Articulated Buses have more spaces for Wheelchairs, buggies etc, whereas Double-deckers have just one or two (only seen on single-door buses).
- Double-decker Buses' staircase severely restricts boarding / alighting speed and is also difficult to use for the elderly
- Is not limited by height restrictions (e.g bridges, tunnels)
So what do you think? Do you prefer articulated buses or double-decker buses?